h4831sc - An Overview

Your session is about to timeout due to inactivity. Click Alright to extend your time and energy for an extra 0 minutes.

I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was acquiring more pressure and was slower compared to old stuff. I do not bear in mind if I even experimented with typical h4831 or not; I'm considering not. Click to expand...

Can they be interchanged with no concerns other then employing ordinary load techniques when switching from large amount to great deal?

I've had a handful of rifles that fouled genuinely poor. Finding each of the copper out was a true PIA until finally I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

Alaska The sc loads up a tad superior but they are the very same thing, a single is just limited Slice. I’ve even blended the normal 1 With all the SC and gotten exactly the same final results as making use of one or another.

It is really very likely that no further dialogue is necessary, through which circumstance we recommend starting off a brand new thread. If on the other hand you feel your response is needed you are able to even now accomplish that.

i've utilized the two and utilized the very same costs and also have not been able to notify any noticable distinctions with functionality. the SC version meters slightly smoother is about all. any feedback??

excaliber mentioned: I've discovered the exact reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Win Mag.

I have discovered the exact opposite to be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.

The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are far better. It bug the hell out of me. I'm sure improved. That is why I do not ever toss out my older manuals. I do purchase new guide all the time to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ levels with none troubles.

I desired a bit additional myself so I went ahead and grabbed the 8lb jug to generally be coated for a while h4831sc (and also have a good amount of the identical lots of powder).

Indeed, You should use a similar load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, even so the SC version may well let you get a tiny bit far more in situations where you are maxing out circumstance volume Along with the regular powder in advance of reaching stress restrictions.

Can I think that H4831 might be substituted for H4831sc ? I know the Bodily change but will it influence the h4831 vs h4831sc melt away or velocity? I believe not but I am not a hundred% positive.

I sawed one in fifty percent to view how thick the jackets were, they usually have been effortlessly twice as thick like a 50-grain hollow level was. Ditto to the sixty four-grain Electric power Position, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie pet dogs or woodchucks. You now know every thing I learn about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know everything in any respect concerning the 223. I question h4831 vs h4831sc that you are going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but let us understand how it goes.